So far in this series of posts and accompanying videos, I have introduced an overarching question about the nature of the UK constitution — and, in particular, about whether it is really as flexible as is commonly supposed — and have considered that question in relation to judicial review, the protection of human rights and… Continue reading Constitutional Law: The Big Picture V — Lessons from EU Membership
Author: Mark Elliott
Mark Elliott is Professor of Public Law at the University of Cambridge, a Fellow of St Catharine's College, Cambridge, and Legal Adviser to the House of Lords Constitution Committee. All views on this blog are expressed in a purely personal capacity.
Constitutional Law: The Big Picture IV — The Territorial Constitution
This is the fourth in a series of posts and accompanying videos on the UK constitution. In earlier pieces in this series, I introduced it and went on to consider judicial review and human rights. The overall aim of this set of posts and videos is to explore the nature of the UK constitution through… Continue reading Constitutional Law: The Big Picture IV — The Territorial Constitution
Constitutional Law: The Big Picture III — Human Rights
The first two pieces in this set of blogposts introduced the series of accompanying lectures and considered the role of judicial review. The overarching purpose of the series is to explore the nature of the United Kingdom’s constitution by asking whether it is better understood as ultimately malleable and flexible — such that a sovereign… Continue reading Constitutional Law: The Big Picture III — Human Rights
Video: Oxford and Cambridge Independent Human Rights Act Review event
The Faculty of Law at Cambridge, jointly with the University of Oxford’s Law Faculty, hosted a ‘virtual roadshow’ on 2 June 2021 as part of the Independent Human Rights Act Review. The event brought together members of the IHRAR Panel, academics from the two universities and members of the public. The aim of the event… Continue reading Video: Oxford and Cambridge Independent Human Rights Act Review event
Constitutional Law: The Big Picture II — Judicial Review
In the first post in this series, I explained that the aim of the accompanying set of videos — which began life as a series of lectures to Cambridge undergraduate Law students — is to address the nature of the UK constitution by posing a particular question about it. The question that I ask is… Continue reading Constitutional Law: The Big Picture II — Judicial Review
Constitutional Law Matters: A new project and a job opportunity
During the academic year 2021-22, Professor Alison Young and I will be leading a new project entitled ‘Constitutional Law Matters’. At the heart of the project, which is generously supported by the Gatsby Foundation, will be two objectives. First, the project will engage with and attempt to answer the question, ‘Does the UK constitution (still)… Continue reading Constitutional Law Matters: A new project and a job opportunity
Oxford/Cambridge Independent Human Rights Act Review Event
As many readers of this blog will know, the Independent Human Rights Act Review (IHRAR) was launched in December 2020 to examine the framework of the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), how it is operating in practice and whether any change is required. The Review is being conducted by a Panel of eight members, chaired… Continue reading Oxford/Cambridge Independent Human Rights Act Review Event
Constitutional Law: The Big Picture I — Introduction
Each year, the lectures in Constitutional Law for undergraduate students at Cambridge are rounded off by a series entitled ‘The Big Picture’. This year, of necessity, they were delivered online rather than in-person, and so I thought I would take the opportunity to make the lectures available here in case they might be of more… Continue reading Constitutional Law: The Big Picture I — Introduction
Judicial review reform IV: Culture war? Two visions of the UK constitution
This is the final in my series of four posts concerning the Report of the Independent Review of Administrative Law (IRAL) and the Government’s Response to it. Focussing particularly on the direction of travel that is envisaged in the latter, I have addressed the potential implications for the doctrine of nullity, the efficacy of ouster clauses and the courts’… Continue reading Judicial review reform IV: Culture war? Two visions of the UK constitution
Judicial review reform III: Substantive review and the courts’ constitutional role
In the first and second posts in this series on the Report of the Independent Review of Administrative Law (IRAL) and the Government’s Response to it, I addressed questions surrounding the doctrine of nullity, potential changes to the effect of remedies and the Government’s wish to reinvigorate ouster clauses. All of those proposals are united by at least one… Continue reading Judicial review reform III: Substantive review and the courts’ constitutional role
