Administrative Law

Below are all of the posts published on Public Law for Everyone in the Administrative Law category.

Posts published in 2017

• The “bedroom tax”, Convention rights and secondary legislation April 28, 2017
• Unison in the Supreme Court: Tribunal Fees, Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law July 26, 2017
• Privacy International in the Court of Appeal: Anisminic distinguished — again November 26, 2017

Older posts

• Is the margin of appreciation something that domestic courts should be applying? February 25, 2013
• Jurisdictional error and the law/fact distinction: Jones (by Caldwell) v First-tier Tribunal [2013] UKSC 19 April 17, 2013
• Standing, judicial review and the rule of law: why we all have a “direct interest” in government according to law July 29, 2013
• Special issue of Judicial Review on legal aid proposals August 9, 2013
• The government’s power to terminate judicial review cases, the rule of law, and the limits of political constitutionalism August 12, 2013
• Consultation on limiting judicial review imminent? September 6, 2013
• New Ministry of Justice consultation paper – Judicial Review: Proposals for Further Reform September 6, 2013
• Justification, calibration and substantive judicial review: putting doctrine in its place September 17, 2013
• Bingham Centre response to latest judicial review proposals November 1, 2013
• Baroness Hale on the value of public-interest standing in judicial review November 4, 2013
• Where next for the Wednesbury principle? A brief response to Lord Carnwath November 19, 2013
• Limits on judicial review of major planning decisions to be announced, says The Times February 4, 2014
• Judicial review reform (again) February 6, 2014
• The super-Wednesbury principle is alive and well: R (Rotherham MBC) v Business Secretary February 17, 2014
• The Miranda case, the fair-balance test, and deference February 20, 2014
• Reasonableness review and the Court of Appeal’s decision in the Prince Charles correspondence case March 12, 2014
• Common-law constitutionalism and proportionality in the Supreme Court: Kennedy v The Charity Commission March 31, 2014
• From legitimate expectation to a doctrine of consistency: DM v Home Secretary April 1, 2014
• Judicial review reform: the report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights April 30, 2014
• The Immigration Act 2014: Judicial review, proportionality and democratic deference May 29, 2014
• Lords Woolf and Brown on proposed limitation of judicial review July 30, 2014
• Human rights, proportionality and the judicial function: R (Carlile) v Home Secretary in the Supreme Court November 13, 2014
• Wilberg and Elliott (eds): The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow December 15, 2014
• From bad to worse: The Justice Secretary on judicial review January 14, 2015
• The Rotherham case in the Supreme Court: Deference, reasonableness and proportionality February 25, 2015
• Proportionality and contextualism in common-law review: The Supreme Court’s judgment in Pham April 17, 2015
• Book chapter: From Bifurcation to Calibration — Twin-Track Deference and the Culture of Justification May 12, 2015
• Now published: Wilberg and Elliott (eds), The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggart’s Rainbow June 1, 2015
• Bourgass in the Supreme Court: Solitary Confinement, the Carltona Doctrine and Procedural Fairness July 29, 2015
• The Unity of Public Law? — The 2016 Public Law Conference September 7, 2015
• Mandalia v Home Secretary [2015] UKSC 59: Legitimate expectations and the consistent application of policy October 14, 2015
• Q: How many Supreme Court Justices does it take to perform the Wednesbury doctrine’s burial rites? A: More than five November 27, 2015
• Declarations, quashing orders and declaratory judgments: The Hawke case and section 84 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 December 15, 2015
• Youssef: Another Supreme Court decision, another set of obiter dicta on substantive judicial review January 28, 2016
• From Heresy to Orthodoxy: Substantive Legitimate Expectations in English Public Law February 11, 2016
• Bell, Elliott, Varuhas and Murray (eds): Public Law Adjudication in Common Law Systems: Process and Substance February 26, 2016
• Ali v United Kingdom: Article 6(1) ECHR and administrative decision-making March 13, 2016
• The 2016 Sir David Williams Lecture: The Lion Beneath the Throne March 14, 2016
• The duty to give reasons and the new statutory “makes no difference” principle April 18, 2016
• Judicial Power’s 50 “problematic” cases and the limits of the judicial role May 9, 2016
• The House of Lords Constitution Committee reports on Article 50 September 13, 2016
• Elliott & Varuhas: Administrative Law January 9, 2017
• Distinguishing Anisminic? Ouster clauses, parliamentary sovereignty and the Privacy International case February 10, 2017
• Oakley v South Cambridgeshire District Council: The maturing of the common law duty to give reasons February 22, 2017
• The Admin Law Blog March 1, 2017
• Discarding the fig-leaf of analytical reasoning? The Hutton case and the law/fact distinction March 24, 2017
• The “bedroom tax”, Convention rights and secondary legislation April 28, 2017
• Unison in the Supreme Court: Tribunal Fees, Constitutional Rights and the Rule of Law July 26, 2017
• Privacy International in the Court of Appeal: Anisminic distinguished — again November 26, 2017
• Through the Looking-Glass? Ouster Clauses, Statutory Interpretation and the British Constitution January 10, 2018
• Consistency as a free-standing principle of administrative law? June 15, 2018
• The Supreme Court’s judgment in Finucane — I: Legitimate expectations, reliance, procedure and substance March 5, 2019
• The Supreme Court’s judgment in Finucane — II: Three unanswered questions concerning the doctrine of legitimate expectation March 8, 2019
• The Judicial Review Review I: The Reform Agenda and its Potential Scope August 3, 2020
• The Judicial Review Review II: Codifying Judicial Review — Clarification or Evisceration? August 10, 2020
• The Judicial Review Review III: Limiting judicial review by ‘clarifying’ non-justiciability — or putting lipstick on the proverbial pig August 20, 2020
• The (constitutional) state we’re in: A week in British politics September 13, 2020
• Judicial review reform I: Nullity, remedies and constitutional gaslighting April 6, 2021
• Judicial review reform II: Ouster clauses and the rule of law April 11, 2021
• Judicial review reform III: Substantive review and the courts’ constitutional role April 17, 2021
• Judicial review reform IV: Culture war? Two visions of the UK constitution April 28, 2021