In an earlier post, I explained that the Freedom of Information Act 2000 gives the government a veto power, allowing it to override rulings that information ought to be released under the Act. The existence of such a power is – from the perspective of those who prize transparency and openness – a major flaw in the legislation. The Attorney-General today exercised the veto power (replicating a decision made by the previous Labour government), overriding a ruling that required the release of the minutes of Cabinet meetings that were held in the run-up to the Iraq war. The Attorney-General seeks to justify his decision on the grounds that releasing the information would be contrary to the public interest and detrimental to effective operation of the government. If you want to read more about this, try the following links:

Posted by Mark Elliott

Mark Elliott is Professor of Public Law at the University of Cambridge, a Fellow of St Catharine's College, Cambridge, and Legal Adviser to the House of Lords Constitution Committee. All views on this blog are expressed in a purely personal capacity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s