Skip

Public Law for Everyone

Professor Mark Elliott

Skip to content
Menu
  • Home
  • Categories
    • 1,000 words
    • Brexit
    • Administrative Law
    • Constitutional Law
    • Human Rights
  • Recent books
    • Public Law
    • The UK Constitution After Miller
    • Administrative Law
    • The Unity of Public Law?
  • For students
    • Useful resources
    • Study advice
    • Guide to Twitter and Blogs
  • Mark Elliott

Prorogation and justiciability: Some thoughts ahead of the Cherry/Miller (No 2) case in the Supreme Court

  • Posted on September 12, 2019September 13, 2019

The Brexit Secretary says he has “set in stone” the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972 — but the legal significance of this misleading claim is very limited

  • Posted on August 18, 2019August 18, 2019

Letter to The Times: Parliament’s (limited) capacity to prevent a no-deal Brexit

  • Posted on August 12, 2019August 12, 2019

Can Parliament prevent a no-deal Brexit?

  • Posted on August 8, 2019August 8, 2019

House of Lords Constitution Committee reports on Parliamentary Scrutiny of Treaties

  • Posted on May 2, 2019August 8, 2019

Royal Assent and constitutional principle: A further response to John Finnis

  • Posted on April 10, 2019

Does the Prime Minister’s request for an Article 50 extension scupper the Cooper-Letwin Bill?

  • Posted on April 5, 2019April 5, 2019

The Cooper-Letwin Bill: Parliamentary control over the extension of Article 50

  • Posted on April 4, 2019April 5, 2019

Did the UK Government act unlawfully by extending Article 50?

  • Posted on March 26, 2019March 29, 2019

Redefining ‘exit day’ in domestic law

  • Posted on March 25, 2019March 25, 2019

Revoking Article 50: Legislating to take a no-deal Brexit off the table

  • Posted on March 25, 2019March 29, 2019

Extending Article 50: Separating myth and legal reality

  • Posted on March 23, 2019March 23, 2019
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on April 5, 2019

Letter to the Times: Response to Professor Brazier’s letter on Royal Assent

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on April 3, 2019

Royal Assent: Letter to The Times

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on April 2, 2019April 2, 2019

Brexit, the Executive and Parliament: A response to John Finnis

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on March 28, 2019March 28, 2019

Meaningful Vote 3: The legal implications of separating the Withdrawal Agreement and the Political Declaration

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on March 26, 2019

What if ‘exit day’ is not redefined in domestic law?

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on March 8, 2019

The Supreme Court’s judgment in Finucane — II: Three unanswered questions concerning the doctrine of legitimate expectation

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on March 5, 2019March 11, 2019

The Supreme Court’s judgment in Finucane — I: Legitimate expectations, reliance, procedure and substance

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on February 26, 2019February 27, 2019

The Healthcare Bill: A case study in the implications (and dangers) of legislating for Brexit

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on February 14, 2019

Video: Cambridge Centre for Public Law event on the Scottish Continuity Bill case

Read More
  • by Mark Elliott
  • Posted on January 21, 2019March 31, 2019

Can the Government veto legislation by advising the Queen to withhold royal assent?

Read More

Posts navigation

Page 1 Page 2 … Page 39 Next Page

About

Public Law for Everyone is written by Mark Elliott. Mark is Professor of Public Law and Deputy Chair of the Faculty of Law at the University of Cambridge, and a Fellow of St Catharine’s College, Cambridge. He also served, from 2015 to 2019, as Legal Adviser to the House of Lords Select Committee on the Constitution. Mark can be found on Twitter as @ProfMarkElliott. Many of his research papers can be downloaded via his SSRN author page. Views set out on this blog are expressed in a purely personal capacity.

Recent papers

Political Pragmatism and Constitutional Principle: The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018

The Miller Tale: An Introduction

Sovereignty, Primacy and the Common Law Constitution: What Has EU Membership Taught Us?

Through the Looking-Glass? Ouster Clauses, Statutory Interpretation and the British Constitution

Judicial Power and the United Kingdom’s Changing Constitution

The Supreme Court’s Judgment in Miller: In Search of Constitutional Principle

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 26,219 other followers

Search

Public Law

Aimed at students taking a range of public law modules, Public Law combines comprehensive coverage of the subject with depth of analysis. Written in an accessible style, it is the UK’s best-selling textbook in the field. The third edition of the book, written by Mark Elliott and Robert Thomas, was published by Oxford University Press in 2017. 

The UK Constitution After Miller

This collection of essays, edited by Mark Elliott, Alison L Young and Jack Williams, critically evaluates the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in the Miller case and examines the decision’s likely long-term consequences for the UK constitution. The UK Constitution After Miller was published by Hart Publishing in 2018.

Administrative Law

Administrative Law is a leading text on English administrative law. The fifth edition, written by Mark Elliott and Jason Varuhas, was published by Oxford University Press in 2017. The book combines carefully selected excerpts from key cases and other materials with detailed commentary and analysis.

Powered by WordPress.com.
Cancel